Legal Opinion

Henry v. Board of Appeals

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 8, 1994No. 92-P-171PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPorada, J.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the plaintiff’s proposed removal of 300,000 to 400,000 cubic yards of earth from a steep hill on her property in order to make that area suitable for the planting and cultivation of Christmas trees is an agricultural activity under G. L. c. 40A, § 3,1 and, therefore, not subject to the *55provisions of the town’s zoning by-law. In the plaintiff’s appeal to the Superior Court from a decision of the board of appeals of Dunstable (board) denying her a permit for such use, the Superior Court judge determined that the plaintiff’s proposed use of her…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Town of Harvard v. MaxantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. Jackson v. Building Inspector of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  3. Steege v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  4. Old Colony Council - Boy Scouts of America v. Zoning Board of Appeals of PlymouthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  5. Town of Sturbridge v. McDowellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Henry v. Board of Appeals of DunstableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API