Legal Opinion

Cogan Kibler, Inc. v. Vito

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 20, 1997No. 44, Sept. Term, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

This negligence claim alleges personal injuries resulting from the inhalation of paint primer fumes in a business office during working hours. At issue is the sufficiency of the plaintiffs evidence of the defendant painter’s primary negligence. The circuit court held that the plaintiff failed to satisfy the requirements of a res ipsa loquitur case. The Court of Special Appeals held that those requirements were satisfied. Vito v. Sargis & Jones, Ltd., 108 Md.App. 408, 672 A.2d 129 (1996). We shall affirm the Court of Special Appeals because, without the need to rely on res ipsa…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Meda v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Dover Elevator Co. v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Frenkil v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  4. Nalee, Inc. v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  5. Baltimore American Underwriters of Baltimore American Insurance v. BeckleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Colbert v. Mayor & City Council of Balt.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Romero v. BrenesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. Romero v. BrenesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API