Legal Opinion

Gross v. MacCornack

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1953No. 5307PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

The primary question before us is which of the parties to this appeal are lawfully entitled to the right to the use of the waters of Willow Spring, a small seep or spring in the Cerbat Range, 3J4 miles northwest of Kingman, Arizona. The lower court determined the issues in favor of the appellees, John F. Gross and his wife, Bertha L. Gross. The appellants E. A. MacCornack and his wife, Harriet MacCornack, have appealed. This review is of the record of two suits that were consolidated for trial in the lower court.

Cause No. 3652

In cause No. 3652, filed in June, 1940, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bristor v. CheathamArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Howard v. PerrinArizona Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Chino Valley v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Gibbons v. Globe Development, Nevada, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API