Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Ray

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1981No. Civ. 59675PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KINGSLEY, J.

This appeal arises from judgment in an unlawful detainer action filed by appellants seeking to terminate respondents’ five-year lease. The trial court held that respondents were not unlawfully detaining the premises and entered judgment in their favor. Plaintiffs appeal from that judgment. For the reasons set forth below we reverse.

The issue on appeal is whether the filing of a lis pendens is constructive notice to a subsequent lessee and therefore binding on him, and, if so, whether the trial court properly applied the doctrine. The case was tried on stipulated facts as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. SchneiderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Evans v. FaughtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Parker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Taylor v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Torrez v. GoughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. RowlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Miscione v. Barton Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Potter (In Re Potter)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1995
  4. In re: Betsey Warren LebbosUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Miscione v. Barton Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API