Formica v. Formica
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*806“[I]n order for appreciation in the value of separate property to be deemed marital property subject to equitable distribution, the nontitled spouse must demonstrate the manner in which his [or her] contributions resulted in the increase in value and the amount of the increase which was attributable to his [or her] efforts” (Embury v Embury, 49 AD3d 802, 804 [2008] [citations and internal quotation marks omitted]; see Price v Price, 69 NY2d 8, 18 [1986]; Imhof v Imhof, 259 AD2d 666, 667 [1999]). Here, although the appellant does not take issue with the Supreme Court’s determination that the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Price v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Johnson v. ChapinNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Embury v. EmburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Scher v. ScherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Imhof v. ImhofAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Doviak v. Finkelstein & Partners, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Patete v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Gillis v. GillisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Turner v. TurnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Gillis v. GillisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.