Legal Opinion

State v. Covert

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 13, 2009No. 26632PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice PLEICONES:

We granted, certiorari to review the Court of Appeals decision in State v. Covert, 368 S.C. 188, 628 S.E.2d 482 (Ct.App.2006)*2071 and now affirm, as modified, that court’s decision to grant respondent a new trial. In a split decision, Judges Short and Anderson found reversible error in the jury’s possession of a statute during deliberations; in addition, Judge Short found that evidence should have been suppressed, and Judge Anderson found reversible error in the verdict form.

We hold, as did Judge Short, that an unsigned search warrant is invalid, and agree with Judge Anderson…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. SachsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Davis v. SandersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1894
  5. State v. MyersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. HerringSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. McKnight.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  4. State v. LemireCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  5. Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API