Legal Opinion

State v. Beekman

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 26, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2011-196688; No. 5145PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHuff, J.

Appellant, Richard Burton Beekman, was convicted of criminal sexual conduct (CSC) with a minor in the first degree and lewd act upon a child. On appeal, Beekman contends the trial court erred in: (1) refusing to sever the two charges because they involved two victims, did not arise out of a single chain of circumstances, and were not provable by the same evidence; (2) admitting alleged prior bad act evidence where there was only a general similarity between the prior bad act and the crime and the probative value was outweighed by its prejudicial effect; and (3) failing to grant a new trial…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. LyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. State v. FreiburgerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
  2. State v. BeekmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  3. State v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  4. State v. BeekmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  5. State v. DaiseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API