Legal Opinion

DeWitt v. American Stock Transfer Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 4, 1977No. 76 Civ. 4126 (GLG)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOETTEL, District Judge.

Defendant, Alrac Corp. (“Alrac”), 1 moves pursuant to Rule 9(m) of the General Rules of this Court to reargue the denial of its Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) 2 motion to dismiss plaintiff DeWitt’s complaint. Alternatively, defendant requests that the Court certify the questions raised for an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).

The.theory of plaintiff’s damage action is that defendant, American Stock Transfer Co. (“A.S.T.”), Alrac’s New York stock transfer agent, acted unreasonably in refusing to transfer shares of Alrac into plaintiff’s name unless A.S.T.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kohn v. Royall, Koegel & WellsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  2. Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Schmidt v. McKayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. Edina State Bank v. Mr. Steak, Inc., and Central Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brass v. American Film Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. Leong v. Hilton Hotels Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1988
  3. Nemeroff v. AbelsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. Nemeroff v. AbelsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (U.S.A.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API