Legal Opinion
Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (U.S.A.)
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 5, 1988No. 85 Civ. 1292(CES)PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
STEWART, District Judge:
Plaintiff Department of Economic Development (“DED”), an agency of the British government operating principally in Northern Ireland, brings this securities fraud action against defendants Arthur Andersen & Co. (USA) (“AA-US”), Arthur Andersen & Co. (Republic of Ireland) (“AA-Ireland”) and Arthur Andersen & Co. (United Kingdom) (“AA-UK”). Defendants are affiliated accounting firms. 1 Plaintiff alleges that defendants certified fraudulent financial statements of various corporations controlled by John Z. DeLorean (“DeLorean”), and thereby committed…
2Cases cited85 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Kahn v. Kohlberg, Kravis, Roberts & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Friedman v. Arizona World Nurseries Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Dietrich v. BauerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Griffin v. McNiffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.