Legal Opinion
Santos v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided November 4, 1992No. 09-91-045 CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURGESS, Justice.
A jury convicted James Richard Santos of delivery of a controlled substance enhanced with two prior felony convictions, and assessed punishment at thirty-five years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. Appellant raises three points of error.
Point of error one challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction for delivery of a controlled substance by actual delivery. The indictment alleged delivery by actual transfer. The jury charge authorized appellant’s conviction as a party to delivery by actual…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Studer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Pitts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Warren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Conaway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Michael Eugene Sharp v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Donley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004
- Carrillo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Robin Denise Donley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004