Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Franchise Tax Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 21, 2000No. 98-56475PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Harry and June Mitchell (“Mitchells”) filed ■ an adversary complaint in their bankruptcy case against the California Franchise Tax Board (“FTB”) and the California Board of Equalization (“Board”) (together, the “State”) to determine the amount and dischargeability of taxes owed to the State. The Mitchells also asserted state and federal claims, alleging, inter alia, violations of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Mitchells appeal the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) affir-mance of the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of all claims for lack of jurisdiction on the basis of…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re: Harry H. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Georgia Higher Education Assistance Corp. v. CrowCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Douglas Indian Association v. Central Council of Tlingit and Haida Tribes of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Contractors' State License Board of California v. DunbarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Franceschi v. State BarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.