Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hawthorne

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 1, 2006PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Majority: DANA, ALEXANDER, CALKINS, and SILVER, JJ.

Concurrence: DANA, and ALEXANDER, JJ.

*434Dissent: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, and LEVY, JJ.

CALKINS, J.

[¶ 1] James and Sheryl Smith appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Hancock County, Hjelm, J.) in favor of Catherine Hawthorne, M.D., following a jury trial on the Smiths’ complaint for medical malpractice. Prior to the trial, a prelitigation screening panel had unanimously determined that (1) Hawthorne deviated from the applicable standard of medical care; (2) the deviation did not cause James Smith’s injury; and (3) Smith’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Prendergast v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Irish v. GimbelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  3. City of Auburn v. MandarelliSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  4. Peters v. SaftSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  5. State v. RyderSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Godin v. SchencksCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  2. Hl 1, LLC v. Riverwalk, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  3. Ford Motor Company v. Darling'sSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  4. John P. Thurlow v. Zakia C. NelsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
  5. Thornton Academy v. Regional School Unit 21Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API