Legal Opinion

Employees Finance Company v. Lathram

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1963No. A-9482PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALVERT, Chief Justice.

In his suit based upon usurious interest charges and unreasonable collection efforts, Crit C. Lathram, as plaintiff, recovered separate judgments against a number of defendants for double the amount of interest paid on loans, as authorized by Art. 5073, Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes, and a joint and several judgment against Employees Finance Company, First Finance Service, Texas Finance Company, Union Finance Company, W. Lee Moore, Jr., individually, W. Lee Moore, Jr., independent executor of the estate of W. Lee Moore, United Finance & Thrift Corporation of Fort Worth…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of West University Place v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Texas Trunk Railway Co. v. Jackson Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Freeman v. BurrowsTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Travis County v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. Cravens v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Housing Authority of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. BMG Direct Marketing, Inc. v. PeakeTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Carrillo v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Highland Church of Christ v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. HuizarTexas Supreme Court · 1987

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API