Legal Opinion

International Paper Co. v. Whilden

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 5, 1985No. 83-144PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal arose out of an action based upon breach of a timber contract. The suit was filed by C.E. and Martha Loftin against International Paper Company. International Paper thereafter filed a third-party complaint against Bill Whilden, individually and doing business as Dale Timber Company (hereinafter referred to as Whilden) based upon an indemnity agreement. The trial court entered a judgment in favor of the Loftins, and, further found that Whilden was not liable to International Paper in the third-party action. International Paper appeals from the portion of the judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Austin Instrument, Inc. v. Loral Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Hartsville Oil Mill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Totem Marine Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Sterling Oil of Oklahoma, Inc. v. PackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Green Tree Financial Corp. v. VintsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Centric Corp. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Clark v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. WRIGHT THERAPY EQUIPMENT, LLC v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Ala.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  5. Penick v. Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge F & a M of Alabama, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API