Schack v. McKey
Appellate Court of Illinois
Bill to Set Aside a Sale of Merchandise, and the appointment of a receiver. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1901.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion per Curiam.
In Hancock v. The American Bonding & Trust Company, 86 Ill. App. 630 (633), it is said:
/ “ The general rule no doubt is, subject to a few exceptions, that a receiver should never be appointed unless it is apparent to the chancellor from the showing made that there is danger that the property which is the subject of the litigation is liable to be dissipated or placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court, or in some way involved by transfers or conveyances, or by its being subjected to other claims, so as to render it more difficult for the court to give and enforce the final…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- County of Cook v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Kimball v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
- Gore v. KramerIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- Comstock v. HenneberryIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
- Black v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fisher v. Hamilton (In Re Teknek, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Hurst v. PapierzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Schack v. McKeyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
- Stone v. StoneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
- Heinze v. Butte & Boston Consolidated Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.