Legal Opinion · Dissent

Heinze v. Butte & Boston Consolidated Min. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 2, 1903No. 852Published

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Montana.

1DissentRoss, Circuit Judge

The amended bill in this suit was filed October 6, 1897, by the Butte & Boston Consolidated Mining Company (appellee here) against John F. Forbis, as executor of the last will and testament of William J. McNamara, deceased, John *12McNamara, and Bridget McNamara, his wife, Daniel W. Connole,. Catherine Sullivan, and Patrick Sullivan, her husband, Joseph Connole, Joseph A. Lewis, Edmond B. Smith, the Old Colony Trust Company, a corporation, and the Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Company, a corporation. After alleging the citizenship of the-respective parties, the bill avers that the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Forgay v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. Holland v. ChallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Frost v. SpitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Gay v. ParpartSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Grant v. Phœnix Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API