Legal Opinion

Hamer v. Lehnhausen

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1975No. 47353PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Underwood

This is another in a succession of cases resulting from the failure of public officials, both State and local, to assess and equalize property for taxing purposes in the manner prescribed by law. E.g., People ex rel. Hamer v. Jones (1968), 39 Ill.2d 360; Hamer v. Mahin (1970), 47 Ill.2d 252; Harte v. Lehnhausen (1975), No. 46533, filed May 19, 1975; People ex rel. Musso v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R.R. Co. (1965), 33 Ill.2d 88, and cases there cited.

Pursuant to our Rule 302(b) (50 Ill.2d R. 302(b)) we transferred here this appeal from an order of the circuit court of Lake County enjoining…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Hamer v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hamer v. MahinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Hamer v. MahinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. People Ex Rel. Ruchty v. SaadIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  5. People ex rel. Musso v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hamer v. KirkIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Property Tax Appeal BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Schlenz v. CastleIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Airey v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Schlenz v. CastleIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API