Legal Opinion

State v. Beeson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

The defendant was convicted of tbe crime of selling intoxicating liquor and has appealed from tbe sentence imposed upon him. In bis brief tbe defendant sets forth five assignments of error and these will be considered in tbe order appearing in tbe bill of exceptions.

It appears from tbe testimony that L. K. Thompson and A. G. Davis were employed on March 30, 1922, by tbe district attorney and the sheriff of Gilliam County, Oregon, to procure evidence against persons engaged in tbe violation of the prohibition law within that county, for which they were to be paid their expenses and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Butts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  2. United States v. HealyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1913
  3. State v. CarmodyOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GunnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. Midwest & Northern Realty Co. v. Standard Garage & Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. State v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API