Legal Opinion

Coyle v. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 4, 1982No. 10085-8-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRingold, J.

Plaintiffs Mary Coyle and Frank Coyle appeal the judgment entered following a jury verdict in favor of defendant Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (Metro). We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Mary Coyle was injured on November 26, 1976, while a passenger on a Metro bus. In 1979 the Coyles brought an action against Metro for damages suffered due to the driver's negligence. Following a jury verdict for the defendant, the trial court denied plaintiffs' alternative motions for judgment n.o.v. and for a new trial and entered judgment dismissing the complaint with prejudice.

The Coyles' sole…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Smith v. RodeneWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Hall v. Corp. of Catholic ArchbishopWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Washington v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Atkins v. CleinWashington Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ford v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Ford v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Wood v. GrohSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. Ford v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Renner v. NestorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API