Legal Opinion

United States v. 49.01 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Osage County, State of Oklahoma

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 30, 1986No. 83-2195PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

Landowners have appealed a district court ruling that our decision in a related condemnation case, United States v. 49.01 *389Acres of Land, 669 F.2d 1364 (10th Cir. 1982) (hereafter Anderson), controls the instant case. We there held that the owners of the land known as the Anderson Unit were not entitled to the enhanced value of their land attributable to construction of the Keystone Dam and Reservoir. The land at issue in the instant case, 0.6 acres on which a flowage easement was taken, was originally included in the Anderson litigation, but was severed from that action…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Scarano v. Central R. Co. Of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  3. William Edwards v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  4. Grady Allen v. Zurich Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  5. Athanasios Konstantinidis and Vasiliki Konstantinidis, His Wife v. C. N. Chen, M. DCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re CluffUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2004
  2. Errato v. American Express Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
  3. United States v. 49.01 Acres Of Land, More Or Less, Situate In Osage County, State Of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API