Legal Opinion

Felton v. Lovett

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2012No. 11-0252PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hecht

Health care must be based on a patient’s informed consent. A health care provider may be liable for failing to disclose to a patient the risks inherent in proposed treatment. The issue in this case is whether the possibility that a patient, due to an undetectable physical condition, will suffer a severe, negative reaction to a procedure is a risk that is inherent in the procedure. We hold that it is and therefore reverse the court of appeals’ judgment 1 for respondent and remand the case to the court of appeals.

Aaron Felton sought treatment for neck pain from Brock Lovett, a doctor of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Holland v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Spencer v. Eagle Star Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. ZeltwangerTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Waffle House, Inc. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Binur v. JacoboTexas Supreme Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Usaa Texas Lloyds Company v. Gail MenchacaTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Abutahoun v. Dow Chemical Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Jim P. Benge, M.D. and Kelsey-Seybold Medical Group PLLC v. Lauren Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
  4. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. AbshireCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center - El Paso v. Gloria Bustillos, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API