Legal Opinion

Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Zeltwanger

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2004No. 02-0120PublishedCited by 387 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Phillips

in which Justice HECHT, Justice OWEN, Justice JEFFERSON, Justice WAINWRIGHT and Justice BRISTER joined.

We must decide whether a plaintiff can recover damages on a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress when the Legislature has created a statutory right to seek emotional damages for the same actions that form the basis of the intentional-infliction claim. The court of appeals concluded that the plaintiff could recover damages under both claims, electing mental anguish and punitive damages under her intentional-infliction claim while taking other compensatory damages and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Schroeder v. Texas Iron Works, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Holland v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. GTE Southwest, Inc. v. BruceTexas Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by387 opinions

  1. Usaa Texas Lloyds Company v. Gail MenchacaTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Alamo Heights Independent School District v. Catherine ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Waffle House, Inc. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Kroger Texas Ltd. Partnership v. SuberuTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. El Apple I, Ltd. v. OlivasTexas Supreme Court · 2012

382 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API