Legal Opinion

Caledonia Insurance v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 13, 1913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Writ of error to the Circuit Court of Escambia County.

1Opinion of the CourtHocker, J.

The defendants in error sued the plaintiff in error to recover the amount of a fire insurance policy on three one-story shingle roof frame dwelling-houses, each insured for $300.00. It appears from the pleadings that these dwelling-houses stood in a row a few feet apart—so close together that the burning of one would cause the burning of the others, and constituting but a single risk; that by the terms of the policy of insurance it was stipulated and agreed that the entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement endorsed thereon or added thereto, should be void if a building therein…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Viele v. Germania InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Tillis v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  3. Eagle Fire Co. v. LewallenSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  4. L'Engle v. Scottish Union & National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  5. German Insurance v. ShaderNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CartmelSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  3. Queen Insurance v. Patterson Drug Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
  4. Palatine Insurance v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  5. Christensen v. Royal InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API