Legal Opinion
Stern v. Stern
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 15, 2013No. A13-0447PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOOTEN, Judge.
Appellant-grandmother challenges the dismissal of her petition for de facto custody of her grandchildren, arguing that the family court erred by concluding that it had no concurrent jurisdiction to consider the petition because of pending child protection and permanency proceedings in juvenile court and that the dismissal of her petition violated her rights to due process.1 Because the family court correctly dismissed appellant’s petition for lack of concurrent jurisdiction, and because appellant was not denied due process, we affirm.
FACTS
On November 29, 2012, appellant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Sawh v. City of Lino LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Dead Lake Ass'n, Inc. v. Otter Tail CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- City of Saint Paul v. EldredgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L.K., ParentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026