Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Atlantic Oceanic Kampgrounds, Inc. v. Camden National Bank

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 5, 1984Published

1Concurrence

GLASSMAN, Justice,

with whom ROBERTS, J., joins, concurring.

I cannot join in the analysis the majority employs in holding 14 M.R.S.A. § 6204-A does not oblige a holder of a real estate mortgage to render the surplus from a post-foreclosure sale of the mortgaged property to the mortgagor or his heirs, successors, or assignees. Because, however, application of section 6204-A in the instant case would constitute an unconstitutional impairment of the mortgage contract before us, I concur in the majority’s result.

Repeatedly, this court has unequivocally declared that the plain meaning of a statute…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. City of El Paso v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API