Legal Opinion

Leo Haviland v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., J. Aron & Company

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 16, 1991No. 285, Docket 90-7460Published

1Opinion of the Court

947 F.2d 601

60 USLW 2316, RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 7861

Leo HAVILAND, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., Defendant,

J. Aron & Company, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 285, Docket 90-7460.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued Oct. 11, 1990.

Decided Oct. 16, 1991.

Gandolfo V. DiBlasi, New York City (Theodore O. Rogers, Jr., Thomas J. Witt, Sullivan & Cromwell, of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Judd Burstein, New York City (Jay Goldberg, P.C., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before MAHONEY and WALKER, Circuit Judges, and McKENNA,* District Judge.

MAHONEY, Circuit Judge:

1

Plaintiff-appe…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API