Legal Opinion

Lincoln v. Grinstead

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1989No. 8814SC809PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

We note at the outset that Attorney Ward was not counsel for defendant-appellant at the trial level.

The sales transaction which forms the basis of this appeal is as follows. On 5 June 1986 defendant and his wife transferred a 1975 Ford pick-up truck to plaintiff in exchange for $7,000.00, a promise to deliver two pistols having an approximate value of $250.00 each, and a $1,000.00 note secured by the vehicle. This deal was evidenced by a conditional sales agreement. On 16 March 1987 defendant carried out a “self-help repossession” pursuant to G.S. sec. 25-9-503, and with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Imports, Inc. v. G. E. Employees Western Region Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Fulton v. East Carolina Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Hammer v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Silverthorne v. Coastal Land Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Crouch v. LOWTHER TRUCKING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matthews v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. In Re Brokers, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2009
  3. Gillespie v. Majestic Transp., Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2017
  4. Harvey v. Cedar CreekNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2000
  5. Rozier v. Haworth, Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API