Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Olberding

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 6, 1899PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Carroll District Court. — Hon. Z. A. Church, Judge. Action for slander. Verdict and judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Deemer, JY

1 The slanderous words were: “You damn Irishman! You stole my wire.” The speaking of these words was admitted, but defendant pleaded in justification that he spoke the truth. Defendant was permitted to offer in evidence the cojay of a written contract between himself and Mrs. Neman, plaintiff’s grantor, concerning the erection of a fence upon or near their division line, from which the wire that plaintiff was charged with having stolen was talien. Defendant testified that he at one time had the original contract, but that it had been blurred with ink by his children; that he put…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Steed v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  3. Langston v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  4. Heusinkveld v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. Holly v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jantzen v. Emanuel German Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Mathews v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  3. First National Bank v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Gibbs v. PotterIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Hawley v. BondSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API