Legal Opinion

Langston v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1892PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from tbe City Court of Montgomery. Tried before tbe Hon. T. M. ARRINGTON. Tbe defendant, Charles Langston, was convicted of larceny, and appeals. Tbe court charged tbe jury, “that so far as tbe evidence was concerned in tbis cause, be would bold that tbe property stolen was not a fixture, but was personal property.” Tbe defendant excepted to tbis charge.

Read the full summary

Appeal from tbe City Court of Montgomery. Tried before tbe Hon. T. M. ARRINGTON. Tbe defendant, Charles Langston, was convicted of larceny, and appeals. Tbe court charged tbe jury, “that so far as tbe evidence was concerned in tbis cause, be would bold that tbe property stolen was not a fixture, but was personal property.” Tbe defendant excepted to tbis charge. He also excepted to tbe refusal of tbe court to give tbe following written charges requested by him; (1.) “Tbe court charges tbe jury, if they believe tbe evidence they must find tbe defendant not guilty of tbe offense charged in tbe…

1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.

The' appellant in this case was indicted and convicted of the larceny of a certain number of valves or cocks. The indictment contained two counts each in the common form for larceny. The first count charges that the valves were the property of M. C. Scott, and the second that the subject of the larceny was the property of the Montgomery Furnace & Chemical Company. There was no conflict in the testimony, and the assignments of error present for our consideration the rulings of the lower court upon the charges given and refused.

The testimony was to the effect that three of the valves alleged to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commercial Fire Ins. v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  2. Gresham v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
  3. Young v. East Ala. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  4. Hancock v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re MorphisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1983
  2. Milford v. Tenn. River Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Sycamore Management Group, LLC v. Coosa Cable Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  4. Hayford v. WentworthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903
  5. Tin Man Roofing Co. v. Birmingham Bd. of Educ.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API