Legal Opinion

Doe 1 v. Howard University

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 11, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2017-0870Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JANE DOE 1, et al., ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 17-cv-870 (TSC) ) ) HOWARD UNIVERISTY, ) ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs are six women, all current or former Howard University students, who allege that Howard discriminated and retaliated against them in violation of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 when they reported sexual assaults from members of the school community. Howard has moved to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons explained below, Howard’s…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Davis Ex Rel. LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API