Wilkes v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*881TERRY, Associate Judge:
Appellant Wilkes was convicted of armed second-degree murder and related offenses.1 At trial he raised an insanity defense and relied primarily- on the expert testimony of a psychiatrist. To impeach that testimony, the government cross-examined the psychiatrist about two statements which the police had taken from Wilkes in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). Later, in rebuttal, the government introduced the statements through the testimony of two police officers. The government also presented three experts of its own, two…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- People v. BoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Dunlap v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- People v. WelshSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- State v. DeGrawWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. KozlovCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.