Legal Opinion

State v. Heath

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1910No. 8218PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurs-ton county, Mitchell, J., entered April 1, 1909, upon a trial and conviction of the crime of assault.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

A complaint was filed against the appellant in the justice court of Thurston county, the body of which is as follows:

“D. W. Simmons being first duly sworn on oath says that, at Mud Bay, in said Thurston county, state of Washington, on the 10th day of April, A. D. 1908, Jack Heath did commit the crime of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to do as follows: Then and there being, the said Jack Heath did assault D. W. Simmons with a deadly weapon, to wit, a shotgun, thereby showing a wilful and abandoned heart, contrary to the form of the statute in such cases made and provided, and against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HubbsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. State v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. State v. BohnWashington Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Auburn v. BrookeWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  3. State v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  4. State v. LeachCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. State v. GeorgeWashington Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API