Legal Opinion

State v. George

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1914No. 11540PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appéal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered May 10, 1913, upon a trial and conviction of attempted sodomy.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Defendant is charged with having attempted to commit the crime of sodomy. The charging part of the information is that he “unlawfully and feloniously did attempt to carnally know one . . ., a living human being, by the anus.” When the case was called for trial, defendant demurred ore terms, and objected to the introduction of any evidence on the ground that “the information does not state facts sufficient to constitute a crime.” This objection was overruled by the court. It was renewed upon a motion in arrest of judgment. The state contends that the objection came too late, citing State v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State v. McBrideWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State v. BodeckarWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. State v. HeathWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lundin v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. State v. GeorgeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State v. WrayWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State v. VaughanWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State v. VaneWashington Supreme Court · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API