Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Daniels

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 17, 1980No. E 80-61PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Judge.

In this employment security benefits case, the appellant contends she quit her job because reimbursement for her gasoline expenses did not increase proportionately with the increase with the cost of gasoline. She contends this was “good cause connected with the work” and thus she should not be disqualified from receiving benefits. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 81-1106(a) (Supp. 1979). We affirm the board of review determination that this was not “good cause connected with the work.”

The appellant contends that her employer, the Arkansas Department of Labor, had increased the territory…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Broyles v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. StilesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Claflin v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API