Armstrong v. Daniels
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Judge.
In this employment security benefits case, the appellant contends she quit her job because reimbursement for her gasoline expenses did not increase proportionately with the increase with the cost of gasoline. She contends this was “good cause connected with the work” and thus she should not be disqualified from receiving benefits. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 81-1106(a) (Supp. 1979). We affirm the board of review determination that this was not “good cause connected with the work.”
The appellant contends that her employer, the Arkansas Department of Labor, had increased the territory…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Broyles v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hopkins v. StilesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
- Claflin v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996