Legal Opinion

Broyles v. Daniels

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 4, 1980No. E 80-14PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Judge.

The appellant has asked us to review the determination of the board of review that he is not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. Although the appellant has not cited any specific deficiency, we will review the record to determine whether there was substantial evidence to support the board’s determination.

The appellant took a job in Texas, and he assumed, or had been told, he would be allowed to share living quarters with two other employees of the appellee company. Although the arrangement seemed to work at first, the employee whose quarters he was sharing…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hiner v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Duncan v. Director, Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Hopkins v. StilesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  4. Armstrong v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  5. Claflin v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API