Moore v. Ewing & Bowen
Supreme Court of New Jersey
One of (hese actions was in covenant, the other in debt. In April Term, 1791, they had been referred to the decision of five arbitrators, whose award or the award of a majority should be final. On the 25th of April, 1791, they made awards unanimously in favor of the defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtKinsey, C. J.
These are motions to show cause why two awards between the same parties, the one in an action of covenant, the other of debt, should not be set aside. To these awards three exceptions have been filed, but, the opinion of the court having been formed upon one of them, renders a *169minute examination of the others unnecessary. A number of affidavits have been read, and a great variety of evidence brought before the court; the material facts, however, are shortly these: It appears that the referees, after hearing the parties and forming their opinions, found some difficulty in drawing up the awards…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kunckle v. KunckleSupreme Court of the United States · 1788
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Arbitration Between Grover and Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Perini Corp. v. Greate Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Perini Corp. v. Greate Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992