Legal Opinion

Doyal & Associates, Inc. v. Wilma Southeast, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 23, 1985No. 70011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Judge.

Appellant, a real estate broker, filed suit against appellees, seeking payment of a real estate brokerage commission under theories of implied consent or quantum meruit. There was no written contract between appellant and any of the appellees. This appeal follows the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to appellees.

1. When appellees’ motions for summary judgment came on for a hearing, the trial court denied the motions because a deposition upon which all parties relied had not been filed. The oversight was immediately rectified and the trial court, after hearing argument,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooley v. All the WorldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Kraft Land Services, Inc. v. Hart Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Gibbs v. NixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. FIELDS REALTY & INSURANCE COMPANY v. TeperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Newman v. James M. Vardaman & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. White & Associates, Inc. v. Decker & Hallman, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  2. Income Properties v. GlassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Pittard MacHinery Company v. Mitsubishi International CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API