Legal Opinion

Cooley v. All the World

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 9, 1981No. 37119PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Justice.

This is a quia timet action, Code Ann. § 37-1411 et seq. (Ga. L. 1966, p. 443 et seq.), which was instituted by the executors and beneficiaries of the estate of Cooley.

The plaintiffs filed this petition, claiming title to an 18-acre tract of land. In the petition, Johnson and Nix are named as adverse claimants to a portion of the subject property. Johnson and Nix answered the petition, claiming title to 8.4 of the 18 acres. The case was heard by a special master, but the hearing was not reported. The special master found that while none of the parties holds legal title to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ammons v. BolickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  2. City of Cornelia v. GunterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  3. Page v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Cagle v. DixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  5. Manning v. ManningSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hubbert v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. P. H. L. Development Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Carter v. BectonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Bonner v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  5. Holbrook v. General Electric Capital Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API