Legal Opinion

Citizens National Bank & Trust Co. v. Serelson (In re Burkart Farm & Livestock)

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 11, 1991No. 90-8067PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

At issue in this appeal is the sufficiency of a land description in a security agreement, which was also filed as a financing statement, covering growing crops. Citizens National Bank & Trust Co. (the bank) appeals the district court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s order holding that the security…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jeffrey Raleigh Hall and Suzanne C. Hall v. Katheryn Vance, Assistant United States TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  2. Bartmann v. Maverick Tube Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. Landen v. Production Credit Ass'n of the MidlandsWyoming Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re GrynbergCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. Smoker v. Hill & Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
  3. Linder v. United States (In Re Linder)District Court, D. Colorado · 1992
  4. Ames v. Sundance State Bank (In re Ames)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. In Re AmesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API