Legal Opinion

Peter Co. v. Green

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 30, 1931No. 7657PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McClendon, c. j.

The record contains no statement of facts, no assignments of error, and no brief for appellant.

Appellee has filed a brief under Courts of Civil Appeals Rule No. 39, and requests af-firmance of the trial court’s judgment.

Appellee is entitled under this rule to have the case considered from the viewpoint of his brief.

Also, it is within the discretion of this court, where appellant has filed no brief, to examine the record, and if no fundamental error is apparent, to affirm the judgment. Haynes v. Radford Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S. W.(2d) 811. For additional authorities on both…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haynes v. J. F. Radford Grocery CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Scottish Union & National Insurance v. ClanceyTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Hawkeye Securities Ins. v. CashionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Hawkeye Securities Ins. v. CashionTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peter Co. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Trawick v. Buckner Orphans' HomeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Central West Texas Ins. Ass'n v. MeyersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Priddy v. PriddyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Reef v. HamblenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API