Legal Opinion

State v. Merced

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided October 25, 2007No. 2006-262-C.APublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice WILLIAMS,

for the Court.

The defendant, Armando Merced (defendant), appeals from a Superior Court judgment of conviction on one count of first-degree child molestation sexual assault, in violation of G.L.1956 §§ 11-37-8.1 and 11-37-8.2, and two counts of second-degree child molestation sexual assault, in violation of §§ 11-37-8.3 and 11-37-8.4. This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on September 25, 2007, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. After hearing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. TooleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  2. State v. GirouardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  4. State v. BoillardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  5. State v. JamesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Arnold v. LebelSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  2. State v. RiveraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  3. State v. John CavanaughSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2017
  4. State v. CookSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  5. State v. Jose ColonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API