Legal Opinion

Smith v. Athern

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1868PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Fifth Judicial District, San Joaquin County. Ttiis was an action to recover the possession of one quarter section of land in San Joaquin County. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Crockett, J.:

This is an action of ejectment, in which the plaintiff claims under a patent from the United States, founded on a preemption certificate; and the defendant under a patent from the State of California, founded on the location of a school land warrant. The complaint is in the usual form, and the answer not only denies title in the plaintiff, but sets up title in the defendant, under the location of the school land warrant, and the patent issued by the State in pursuance thereof.

On the trial the plaintiff put in evidence his patent from the United States; and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bagnell v. BroderickSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Hidden v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Megerle v. AsheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Grogan v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Megerle v. AsheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Bernhard v. WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Judson v. LyfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Moss v. AtkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API