Legal Opinion
McNamara v. Nomeco Building Specialties, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 2, 1998No. Civ. 97-310 (JMR/RLE)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSENBAUM, District Judge.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-titled matter, it is—
ORDERED:
1. That Defendant Nomeco Building Specialties’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 13] is granted, as to the Plaintiffs’ Seventh Cause of Action, under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, but denied as to the Plaintiffs’ Fourth and Sixth Causes of Action, under the Minnesota Consumer Fraud Act.
2. That the Plaintiffs’ Seventh Cause of Action is dismissed,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Good Samaritan Hospital v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Curtis Lumber Co., Inc. v. Louisiana Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Meyer v. DygertDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
- Anderson v. Newmar Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2004
- (PC) Gomez v. UnknownDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Bollom v. Brunswick CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.