Legal Opinion

Norell Forest Products v. H&S Lumber Co.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 16, 1992No. 1787PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Judge:

Norell Forest Products (Norell) sued H&S Lumber Company (H&S) on an account stated. A certified statement of the account was attached to Norell’s complaint. H&S counterclaimed alleging a cause of action for breach of contract and special damages. H&S insists that its counterclaim is based on breach of contract rather than equitable indemnity. The matter was heard by the trial judge without a jury resulting in an oral order denying relief to Norell and granting H&S judg*97ment on part of its counterclaim in the amount of $2,500. We reverse and remand.

ISSUES

The issues of merit are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Windham v. HoneycuttCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Griffin v. Van NormanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Care & Treatment of KennedyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Norell Forest Products v. H & S Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API