Norell Forest Products v. H&S Lumber Co.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Gardner, Judge:
Norell Forest Products (Norell) sued H&S Lumber Company (H&S) on an account stated. A certified statement of the account was attached to Norell’s complaint. H&S counterclaimed alleging a cause of action for breach of contract and special damages. H&S insists that its counterclaim is based on breach of contract rather than equitable indemnity. The matter was heard by the trial judge without a jury resulting in an oral order denying relief to Norell and granting H&S judg*97ment on part of its counterclaim in the amount of $2,500. We reverse and remand.
ISSUES
The issues of merit are…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Windham v. HoneycuttCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Griffin v. Van NormanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re the Care & Treatment of KennedyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Norell Forest Products v. H & S Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993