Legal Opinion
State of Maine v. David Reckards
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided March 17, 2015No. Docket Kno-14-196PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMead, J.
[¶ 1] David Reekards appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Knox County, Hjelm, J.) denying his motions to dismiss two criminal cases against him on the ground that the statute defining a “synthetic hallucinogenic drug,” 17-A M.R.S. § 1101(16-A)(O) (2012), is unconstitutionally vague. We affirm the judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
[¶2] On July 10, 2013, a grand jury indicted Reekards on several charges including unlawful trafficking in synthetic hallucinogenic drugs (Class B), 17-A M.R.S. § 1120(1) (2012), and conspiracy to commit unlawful trafficking in synthetic hallucinogenic drugs (Class C),…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. James R. TurcotteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. HusseinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- United States v. HassanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Daahir CaseerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State of Maine v. Jacob R. Labbe Sr.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
- In re Weapons Restriction of J.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022
- State of Maine v. Joseph M. Solomon IISupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
- Gessner v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- Beauchene v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.