Legal Opinion

Breeden v. Breeden

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 16, 1947No. 15950PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DuaKwoMTii, Presiding Justice.

1. “An injunction will not he granted to restrain an official in the exercise of his judicial functions; the writ lies only against suitors in the proceedings before him.” Hood v. Hood, 132 Ga. 778 (2) (64 S. E. 1074) ; Stone v. King-Hodgson Co., 140 Ga. 487 (3) (79 S. E. 122) ; Askew v. Bassett Furniture Co., 172 Ga. 700 (2-a) (158 S. E. 577). It follows that the petition of the husband, seeking to enjoin the ordinary from acting on the wife’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus and to enjoin the wife from prosecuting the action, was subject to the ground of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ponder v. PonderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Black v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. Askew v. Bassett Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  4. Stone v. King-Hodgson Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Duke v. DukeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Perry v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  2. Grayson v. GraysonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  3. In the Interest of J. C. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Morris v. MullisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Tirado v. ShelnuttCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API