Legal Opinion

United States of America, Frederic J. Cowan, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Intervening v. The Stearns Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 29, 1992No. 91-5334PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.

The Stearns Company (“Stearns”) appeals the District Court’s denial of relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Stearns sought reconsideration of the District Court’s earlier finding that Stearns did not possess the right to remove minerals by strip mining from a parcel of land it deeded to the United States in 1937. Specifically, Stearns asked the District Court to reconsider the case in light of the Kentucky Supreme Court case of Akers v. Baldwin, 736 S.W.2d 294 (Ky.1987), which redefined Kentucky law as it related to the dominance of a mineral estate over…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. Kentucky Oak Mining CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  2. Akers v. BaldwinKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Commerce Union Bank v. KinkadeKentucky Supreme Court · 1976
  4. United States v. Stearns Coal and Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. The Stearns Company (Formerly Known as Stearns Coal and Lumber Company)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ward v. HardingKentucky Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ward v. HardingKentucky Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API