United States of America, Frederic J. Cowan, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Intervening v. The Stearns Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
The Stearns Company (“Stearns”) appeals the District Court’s denial of relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Stearns sought reconsideration of the District Court’s earlier finding that Stearns did not possess the right to remove minerals by strip mining from a parcel of land it deeded to the United States in 1937. Specifically, Stearns asked the District Court to reconsider the case in light of the Kentucky Supreme Court case of Akers v. Baldwin, 736 S.W.2d 294 (Ky.1987), which redefined Kentucky law as it related to the dominance of a mineral estate over…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Martin v. Kentucky Oak Mining CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
- Akers v. BaldwinKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
- Commerce Union Bank v. KinkadeKentucky Supreme Court · 1976
- United States v. Stearns Coal and Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. The Stearns Company (Formerly Known as Stearns Coal and Lumber Company)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ward v. HardingKentucky Supreme Court · 1993
- Ward v. HardingKentucky Supreme Court · 1993