Legal Opinion

Ward v. Harding

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1993No. 88-SC-825-DGPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBERT, Justice.

With ratification of Section 19(2) of the Constitution of Kentucky,1 the people swept away decades of litigation and numerous court decisions addressing the proper construction of so-called “broad form” deeds. By the amendment, the people have declared that henceforth in instruments of conveyance of the type at issue here, it shall be held, in the absence of clear and convincing evidence to the contrary, that coal extraction be only by the known methods in the area at the time the instruments were executed. That the Constitution may be so amended is an indisputable…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. City of El Paso v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Skivolocki v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Proctor v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. O'BRYAN v. HedgespethKentucky Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Spurlin v. AdkinsKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Florman v. MEBCO Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2006
  5. American Land Holdings of Indiana v. Stanley JobeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API