Legal Opinion

Boertmann v. Cincinnati Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 2011No. Docket No. 293835Published

1Opinion of the CourtMeter, J.

Defendant appeals as of right from a grant of summary disposition to plaintiff under MCR 2.116(C)(10). The undisputed evidence showed that plaintiff suffered psychological injuries from witnessing the death of her son in a motor vehicle accident. We hold that the trial court correctly concluded that plaintiffs injuries arose out of the use of a motor vehicle as a motor vehicle and that she was therefore entitled to no-fault personal insurance protection (PIP) benefits. Accordingly, we affirm.

On September 1, 2007, plaintiff was driving a motor vehicle that was insured by defendant. She was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Thornton v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Bourne v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Wolfe v. State Farm Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  5. Williams v. Citizens Mutual Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API