Legal Opinion

Mary Conception Anderson v. Snohomish County, et al.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 3, 2026No. 2:25-cv-01705Unknown

1Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 MARY CONCEPTION ANDERSON, CASE NO. C25-1705-JCC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 SNOHOMISH COUNTY, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court sua sponte, following Defendants’ motion for a 16 partial judgment on the pleadings. (Dkt. No. 24.) In that motion, Defendants argue that 17 prosecutorial immunity is a complete defense to claims involving the blanket use of RCW 18 3.34.110 affidavits of prejudice. (Id. at 9–12.) This argument raises issues of state…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Affiliated FM Insurance v. LTK Consulting Services Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. In re the Parenting Plan of HallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API